50 Claude Prompts for Marketers: Copy, Research, Ads, Email, SEO

You are a direct-response copywriter writing Facebook primary text for [PRODUCT].
Target audience: [ICP — age, job title, key frustration].
The core pain is: [PAIN POINT].

Write a 150-word Facebook primary text ad in pain-agitation-solution structure:
1. Open with the pain in one punchy sentence (no questions).
2. Agitate for 2-3 sentences — make the reader feel the cost of not solving this.
3. Introduce the product as the solution in 2 sentences.
4. Close with a single-sentence CTA.

Do not use exclamation marks. Avoid the words "transform," "oversell," "silver-bullet."
Output: one complete ad block, no commentary.

You are writing ad headlines for [PRODUCT] targeting [ICP].
Winning hook: [HOOK SENTENCE].

Generate a matrix of 15 headline variants:
- 5 under 40 characters (Facebook headline / Google RSA)
- 5 between 40–70 characters (YouTube title / DTC landing page)
- 5 that flip the hook into a question, a statistic, or a bold claim

For each, label the type and character count.
No fluffy openers. Every headline should be able to stand alone.

Write a UGC-style 30-second video script for [PRODUCT].
Creator persona: [AGE, GENDER, LIFESTYLE — e.g., "28-year-old female, remote worker, fitness-curious"].
Core message: [SINGLE BENEFIT OR CLAIM].
Tone: conversational, real — not polished or corporate.

Structure:
0–3s: hook (visual action + spoken line, must stop the scroll)
3–20s: problem → solution story in first person
20–28s: proof point (result, before/after, or demonstration)
28–30s: CTA

Format as a shooting script with [VISUAL] and [VOICEOVER] labeled per segment.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Offer: [SPECIFIC OFFER — e.g., "30-day free trial, no credit card"]
Primary customer objection to clicking: [OBJECTION]

Write 5 CTA button variants:
1. Value-led (what they get)
2. Action-led (what they do)
3. Urgency-led (time or scarcity)
4. Objection-reversing (addresses the fear directly)
5. Curiosity-led (implies something unknown)

Max 6 words per button. Label each with its type.

I am writing a Facebook ad targeting users of [COMPETITOR PRODUCT].
My product: [YOUR PRODUCT].
Key differentiation: [2–3 CONCRETE DIFFERENCES — price, feature, experience].

Write a 120-word primary text ad that:
- Opens by acknowledging what the competitor does well (one sentence — no negativity)
- Pivots to a specific gap or limitation users commonly feel
- Positions your product as the natural next step
- Ends with a soft CTA focused on comparison or switching

Tone: confident, not arrogant. No direct competitor name-calling.

I am writing an advertorial for [PRODUCT] targeting [ICP].
The content angle is: [TOPIC — e.g., "why most people never fix their sleep"].

Write 4 alternative opening paragraphs (100–120 words each) for this advertorial.
Each must:
- Read like editorial journalism, not marketing copy
- Create curiosity or tension that demands the next paragraph
- Plant the problem the product solves without naming the product

Label each with its narrative device: anecdote, statistic, contrarian claim, or scene-setting.

Product: [PRODUCT NAME]
Primary benefit: [BENEFIT]
Secondary benefits: [LIST 3]
Target buyer: [ICP]
Price point: [PRICE]

Write 3 full above-the-fold copy sets, each containing:
- Hero headline (under 10 words)
- Subheadline (one sentence, 15–25 words, elaborates on headline)
- 3 bullet points (benefit-first, max 8 words each)

Variant 1: lead with outcome
Variant 2: lead with mechanism (how it works)
Variant 3: lead with social proof or authority signal

No generic openers like "Introducing" or "Meet."

I am going to paste copy that needs to be rewritten. For each sentence or bullet, apply the "so what?" filter repeatedly until you reach a real customer outcome. Then rewrite the copy with only the final-level benefit.

Rules:
- Do not add claims that are not implied by the original
- Keep the same approximate length
- Use second-person ("you," "your")
- No marketing clichés

Original copy:
[PASTE COPY HERE]

I am going to paste descriptions of [NUMBER] ads from [COMPETITOR].
For each ad, analyze and output:
1. Hook type (question / statistic / bold claim / narrative / curiosity gap)
2. Primary emotion targeted (fear, aspiration, frustration, social proof, urgency)
3. Funnel stage implied (awareness / consideration / conversion)
4. Unique mechanism or claim used
5. Estimated audience this would resonate with most

After all individual analyses, give me:
- The 2–3 dominant creative patterns this brand relies on
- The gaps or angles they are NOT addressing
- One positioning opportunity for a competitor brand

Ads:
[PASTE AD DESCRIPTIONS OR COPY HERE]

Category: [PRODUCT CATEGORY]
Key players: [LIST 5–8 COMPETITORS AND THEIR CORE POSITIONING IN ONE SENTENCE EACH]
My product: [YOUR PRODUCT AND ITS CURRENT OR DRAFT POSITIONING]

Analyze the positioning landscape and identify:
1. The 3 most overcrowded positioning territories (where everyone says the same thing)
2. The 3 most underserved positioning angles — things true buyers care about that no brand is leading with
3. Which of those angles my product can credibly own based on its actual attributes
4. A one-sentence positioning statement for each credible angle

Base your analysis on the data I provided. Flag any assumptions you are making.

I am going to paste customer reviews for [COMPETITOR PRODUCT]. Your task is to extract ICP insights.

For each distinct customer persona you identify in the reviews:
- Describe the persona in 3 sentences (demographics, situation, motivation)
- List the top 2 jobs-to-be-done they are hiring this product for
- Note the language they use to describe their problem (direct quotes preferred)
- Flag if this persona is underserved or if they express unmet needs

After analysis:
- Identify the persona most underserved by the current product
- Suggest one product or messaging angle that would convert this persona more effectively

Reviews:
[PASTE REVIEWS]

I am going to paste the full copy of a competitor landing page. Produce a strategic SWOT:

Strengths: What are they doing exceptionally well in their messaging and conversion flow?
Weaknesses: Where are there gaps, vague claims, or missed objections?
Opportunities: What angles or proof points are they leaving on the table?
Threats: What does this page tell you about how they plan to attack the market?

Then write: "If I were their CMO, the one thing I would change immediately is ___"

Landing page copy:
[PASTE COPY]

Product: [PRODUCT]
Target audience segment: [SEGMENT — be specific: "US-based freelance designers aged 25–40"]
Channel being evaluated: [CHANNEL]

Help me build a rough market sizing argument using:
1. Estimated total addressable audience on this channel (state your assumptions clearly)
2. Realistic reach and CPM range based on this audience's characteristics
3. Estimated conversion funnel (CTR, landing page CVR, close rate — use conservative benchmarks)
4. Implied CAC range at those benchmarks
5. Break-even analysis if my current LTV is [LTV]

Present this as a one-page investment memo a non-marketer could read.

Category: [PRODUCT CATEGORY]
Customer: [ICP]

Identify 8–10 category entry points — the specific triggering events, life moments, or frustrations that cause someone to start searching for a solution in this category.

For each entry point:
- Describe the trigger event in one sentence
- Write the exact Google search query this person would type
- Rate the urgency level (1–5)
- Suggest the best ad format and message angle to capture this moment

Prioritize by conversion potential (combination of urgency and volume).

My product: [PRODUCT]
My current homepage headline and subhead: [PASTE]
Competitor: [COMPETITOR]
Their homepage headline and subhead: [PASTE]

Evaluate head-to-head:
1. Who wins on clarity? (Which message is faster to understand?)
2. Who wins on differentiation? (Which message is more distinct from the category?)
3. Who wins on desire? (Which message creates stronger wanting?)
4. What is my single biggest vulnerability if a prospect sees both pages?
5. Write a revised headline and subhead for my product that wins on all three dimensions.

Target keyword: [PRIMARY KEYWORD]
Secondary keywords: [LIST 3–5]
Search intent: [INFORMATIONAL / COMMERCIAL / TRANSACTIONAL]
Target audience: [ICP]
Desired outcome: [WHAT DO YOU WANT THE READER TO DO?]

Write a complete content brief:
1. Title tag (55–60 characters)
2. Meta description (150–160 characters)
3. Article angle (why this article, why now, why from us)
4. Recommended H1 (different from title tag)
5. Outline: H2s and H3s with 1–2 sentence description of each section
6. Key claims or data points to include
7. 3 competitor articles to differentiate from (describe what they likely cover)
8. Internal linking opportunities
9. Word count recommendation with justification

Page topic: [TOPIC]
Target keyword cluster: [LIST 5–10 RELATED KEYWORDS]

Generate 8 FAQ entries optimized for this page. For each:
- Write the question in natural language (how a real person would ask it)
- Write a 40–60 word answer that directly answers the question, includes the keyword naturally, and ends with a clear next step or implication
- Flag if this question is likely to appear in a "People Also Ask" box

Format as ready-to-paste FAQ schema JSON-LD after the plain-text version.

Core topic: [TOPIC]
My site: [SITE/BRAND DESCRIPTION]
Target audience: [ICP]

Build a full topical authority content cluster:
1. Pillar page title and angle (the comprehensive hub)
2. 8 cluster articles: title, primary keyword, search intent, and 2-sentence description each
3. 3 "anti-articles" — topics adjacent to this cluster that we should NOT write (low intent, high competition, off-strategy)
4. Internal linking structure: which cluster articles link to the pillar, and to each other
5. Estimated difficulty rating for each piece (easy / medium / hard) based on likely SERP competition

Format as a planning table I can drop into a project management tool.

I am going to paste a list of pages with their current title tags and meta descriptions. For each, write:
- A new title tag (55–60 characters, include primary keyword near the front, no click-bait)
- A new meta description (150–160 characters, include a benefit and a CTA, no keyword stuffing)

Rules:
- Every title must be unique
- Do not repeat the same CTA across descriptions
- Flag any pages where the current URL slug does not match the optimized keyword target

Pages:
[PASTE PAGE LIST]

Article URL: [URL]
Current ranking position: [POSITION] for keyword [KEYWORD]
Publish date: [DATE]
Current word count: [COUNT]

I am going to paste the current article content. Your task:
1. Identify the top 3 reasons this article may be declining (freshness, intent mismatch, thin sections, missing entities)
2. List 5 specific additions or updates that would address those issues
3. Identify 2 sections that should be cut or shortened
4. Write a revised introduction (150 words) that better matches current search intent
5. Suggest 3 new internal or external links that would increase topical depth

Current article:
[PASTE ARTICLE]

Page type: [LOCATION / USE-CASE / COMPARISON / VS]
Template goal: rank for "[KEYWORD] + [VARIABLE]" where the variable is [LIST OF VARIABLES]

Build a programmatic content template:
1. Title tag formula (with [VARIABLE] placeholder)
2. H1 formula
3. Introduction paragraph template (100 words, with [VARIABLE] slots marked)
4. 4 H2 sections with content formulas for each
5. FAQ section with 3 questions (some static, some [VARIABLE]-dependent)
6. Meta description formula

For each formula, show one fully filled example using [EXAMPLE VARIABLE].
Flag which sections require human review vs. can be fully auto-generated.

Target keyword: [KEYWORD — e.g., "best CRM for freelancers"]
Search intent: comparison / recommendation
Target reader: [ICP]

Write a 10-item listicle outline optimized for a featured snippet:
- Ordering logic (what determines rank 1 vs. rank 10)
- For each item: name, one-sentence description (snippet-optimized: starts with the item name, under 30 words), and the key differentiator
- Intro paragraph (50 words, directly states what the list covers and why)
- H2 naming convention for each entry
- Suggested meta title and description

Format the list section in markdown table format as well (alternative snippet type).

Product: [PRODUCT]
Customer just did: [TRIGGER ACTION — e.g., "purchased for the first time" or "signed up for free trial"]
Primary goal of this sequence: [GOAL — activate, educate, convert, upsell]
Brand tone: [TONE]

Write a 5-email welcome sequence. For each email:
- Subject line (A and B variant)
- Preview text
- Email body (150–200 words)
- Primary CTA
- Send timing relative to trigger

Email 1: Welcome + immediate value
Email 2: Address the #1 new user mistake or misconception
Email 3: Social proof (case study, review, or story)
Email 4: Product education — show a feature or use case they may have missed
Email 5: Soft sell or upgrade push

Use [FIRST NAME] for personalization tokens.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Churn definition: [HOW LONG THEY HAVE BEEN INACTIVE]
Average order value: [AOV]
Top churn reason (if known): [REASON OR "unknown"]

Write a 3-email win-back sequence:
Email 1 (send at [X] days inactive): Re-engagement hook — do not mention they churned, lead with value
Email 2 (send [X+7] days): Acknowledge the silence, offer an incentive ([OFFER])
Email 3 (send [X+14] days): Final "should we say goodbye?" — create urgency, make unsubscribing feel like a real loss

For each: subject line, preview text, 120-word body, CTA.
Keep the tone warm, not desperate.

Promotion: [PROMOTION — e.g., "20% off sitewide, 48 hours only"]
Product category: [CATEGORY]
Audience: [SEGMENT — e.g., "buyers who purchased 60+ days ago"]

Write 12 subject line variants organized by strategy:
- 3 urgency/scarcity
- 3 curiosity/mystery
- 3 direct value (state the offer)
- 3 personalized or conversational

For each, include a preview text that complements (does not repeat) the subject.
Label each with its psychological trigger.
Flag your top 2 picks and explain why.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Send timing: [X days after delivery confirmation]
Review platform: [PLATFORM — Shopify Reviews, Trustpilot, Google, etc.]
Average buyer: [ICP]

Write an email that drives review submission:
- Subject line that does not mention "review" or "feedback" (too clinical)
- Opening that references the specific product or purchase without being creepy
- 3-sentence bridge: acknowledge they have now had time to try it, make them feel their review matters to other buyers like them
- CTA to the review platform
- Fallback: if they had a bad experience, here is how to reach us first

Total email length: under 120 words.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Price point: [PRICE]
Top 3 reasons someone might not buy: [LIST]
Do we have an offer to include? [YES — OFFER / NO]

Write a 3-email abandoned cart sequence:
Email 1 (1 hour after abandon): Gentle reminder, no pressure, show the product
Email 2 (24 hours): Address the most common objection — handle it without discounting if possible
Email 3 (48–72 hours): [Include offer if YES / Create urgency without discount if NO]

For each: subject, preview text, body (under 150 words), CTA.
Do not use "You left something behind" as the subject — give me something more original.

List age: [HOW OLD IS THE COLD SEGMENT]
Last campaign performance: [OPEN RATE, CLICK RATE]
Brand: [BRAND NAME]
Tone: [TONE]

Write a re-permission email that:
- Opens with radical honesty: it has been a while, things may have changed
- Quickly re-states what value subscribers get by staying on the list
- Gives an unmissable CTA to "stay subscribed" (confirm preference)
- Sets expectations: if they do not click, they will be removed in [X] days
- Is under 100 words total

Also provide: subject line, preview text, and the plain-text unsubscribe/confirm button label.

I am going to paste raw campaign performance data. Write a 300-word performance narrative for a non-technical stakeholder audience (CMO or founder level).

Structure:
1. One-sentence verdict: did this campaign work?
2. The 2 metrics that matter most, and what they tell us
3. The most surprising finding (positive or negative)
4. The one thing we would change immediately
5. Recommended next action

Rules:
- No jargon without explanation
- Lead with insights, not metrics
- Use specific numbers, not just percentages

Data:
[PASTE DATA]

Test description: [WHAT WAS TESTED]
Control performance: [METRIC — e.g., "CVR 2.3%, n=1,450"]
Variant performance: [METRIC — e.g., "CVR 2.8%, n=1,470"]
Test duration: [DAYS]
Business context: [WHAT THIS METRIC MEANS TO REVENUE — e.g., "$40 AOV, 100k monthly visitors"]

Provide:
1. Statistical significance (calculate or estimate, show your work)
2. Practical significance: what is the revenue impact if we roll this out?
3. Should we ship, test longer, or reject? Justify your recommendation.
4. What confounders should I check before shipping?
5. What follow-up test would you run next based on these results?

Channels covered: [LIST]
Reporting period: [MONTH]
KPIs tracked: [LIST PRIMARY KPIs]
Audience: [WHO READS THIS REPORT]

Build a report template with:
1. Executive summary (5 bullets max — written, not just numbers)
2. Channel-by-channel performance table (suggest column headers)
3. Creative performance section: format for showing top/bottom performers and the insight from each
4. Budget pacing section
5. Anomalies and explanations
6. Next month priorities (3 max)

For each section, write one example row or paragraph using placeholder data so the template is ready to fill in.

Campaign: [CAMPAIGN NAME OR DESCRIPTION]
Channels used: [LIST]
Attribution model in use: [MODEL — last click, first click, linear, etc.]
The problem: [DESCRIBE THE ATTRIBUTION DISCREPANCY OR CONFUSION]

Help me write a 200-word attribution narrative that:
- Explains what the data shows at face value
- Explains why the attribution model creates a distorted picture
- Gives my best estimate of true contribution from each channel
- Proposes a more accurate measurement approach for next time

Assume the reader understands marketing but does not understand statistics.

Funnel: [DESCRIBE THE CONVERSION FUNNEL — e.g., "ad click → landing page → add to cart → checkout → purchase"]
Drop-off point: [STEP WITH THE BIGGEST DROP AND THE DROP RATE]
Product: [PRODUCT]
Price: [PRICE]
Target audience: [ICP]

Generate a structured diagnostic:
1. The 5 most likely causes of this specific drop-off, ranked by probability
2. For each cause: the diagnostic test I should run to confirm it (heatmap, survey, copy test, etc.)
3. For each cause: the fix if confirmed
4. The one experiment I should run first, and why

Also flag: are there any benchmark drop rates for this funnel type I should calibrate against?

Business context: [DESCRIBE BUSINESS — stage, revenue, margins, product type]
Current channel mix: [LIST CHANNELS AND ROUGH % OF BUDGET]
Current performance by channel: [PASTE OR DESCRIBE]
Goal for next quarter: [GROWTH TARGET OR CONSTRAINT]

Build a channel mix recommendation:
1. Evaluate each current channel: hold, scale, or cut — with one-sentence rationale
2. Identify one untested channel worth a 10% budget test, with justification
3. Recommend the reallocation in percentage terms
4. List the top 3 risks in this allocation
5. Define what success looks like at 30, 60, and 90 days

Ground your recommendations in what I have told you. Flag if you are making assumptions.

I am going to paste examples of copy from our brand — ads, emails, product descriptions, social posts. Analyze this corpus and produce a brand voice guide:

1. Voice adjectives: 4 words that describe our voice, each with a one-sentence definition and one example from the corpus
2. Tone spectrum: how does tone shift across contexts (ad vs. support email vs. product page)?
3. Vocabulary rules: 5 words or phrases we use, 5 we never use
4. Sentence structure patterns: what makes our sentences sound like us?
5. What our voice is NOT: 3 brand voice archetypes we are clearly not

Format as a reference document a new copywriter could use immediately.

Copy examples:
[PASTE EXAMPLES]

Product being launched: [PRODUCT]
Audience segments: [LIST 2–3 SEGMENTS]
Launch goal: [AWARENESS / TRIAL / PURCHASE / WAITLIST]
Core claim: [THE ONE THING THIS PRODUCT DOES BETTER THAN ANYTHING ELSE]

Build a messaging hierarchy:
1. Master narrative: the overarching story of why this product exists now
2. Primary message: one sentence, works across all segments
3. Per-segment messages: tailored version of primary message for each segment (1–2 sentences each)
4. Supporting proofs: 3 facts, results, or stories that substantiate the primary claim
5. Objection responses: top 3 anticipated objections and the pre-emptive message for each
6. Messaging to avoid: 2 angles that are tempting but would undermine the positioning

Output as a one-page hierarchy document.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Target customer: [ICP — be specific]
Category: [COMPETITIVE SET — what category does this compete in?]
Differentiation: [WHAT YOU DO THAT COMPETITORS DO NOT]
Proof: [EVIDENCE FOR THAT DIFFERENTIATION]

Write 3 versions of a positioning statement using the format:
"For [TARGET CUSTOMER] who [NEED OR SITUATION], [BRAND] is the [CATEGORY] that [DIFFERENTIATED BENEFIT] because [PROOF]."

Version 1: rational, feature-led
Version 2: emotional, outcome-led
Version 3: challenger, category-reframing

After the three statements, recommend which one is most defensible long-term and explain why.

Brand: [BRAND]
Core positioning: [ONE SENTENCE]
Audience: [ICP]
Emotion to evoke: [EMOTION — e.g., confidence, relief, ambition]

Generate 20 tagline candidates:
- 5 under 4 words
- 5 that start with a verb
- 5 that name a specific enemy, fear, or tension
- 5 that make a promise

For each, score it (1–5) on: memorability, differentiation, emotional resonance.
Then select your top 3 and explain what makes each work.

Do not use the words "better," "smarter," "faster," "future," "empower," or "transform."

Brand: [BRAND]
Founding insight: [WHAT DID THE FOUNDER SEE THAT OTHERS MISSED?]
What the industry gets wrong: [THE PROBLEM WITH THE STATUS QUO]
What we believe: [YOUR CORE CONVICTION]
Who we serve: [ICP]

Write a 300-word brand manifesto for the About/Story page that:
- Opens with the industry's broken promise (not the founder's childhood)
- Builds to the conviction that drove the brand's creation
- Ends with a declaration of who you are here to serve and what you are here to change
- Reads like it was written by a human who is angry about something, not a brand team

Avoid: "we started in a garage," "we believe everyone deserves," "we're on a mission to."

Product: [PRODUCT]
Known demographics: [AGE, INCOME, LOCATION, JOB TITLE IF KNOWN]
Behavioral signal: [HOW WE ACQUIRED THEM OR WHAT THEY DO IN PRODUCT]

Write a psychographic ICP profile with:
1. Identity: how this person sees themselves, what they aspire to be
2. Threat: what they are afraid of — the failure mode they most want to avoid
3. Information diet: where they get their news, whose opinions they trust
4. Decision trigger: what would have to be true for them to buy today
5. Language: 5 phrases they would use to describe their problem, in their own words
6. The ad that would make them stop scrolling: describe it in detail

This persona should be specific enough that a copywriter could read it and immediately know what NOT to write.

Campaign objective: [OBJECTIVE]
Target audience: [ICP]
Budget and timeline: [BUDGET / TIMELINE]
Channels: [LIST]
Creative formats needed: [LIST FORMATS AND QUANTITIES]
Brand voice: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OR LINK TO GUIDE]
Constraints: [MANDATORY CLAIMS, LEGAL RESTRICTIONS, FORMATS TO AVOID]

Write a complete creative strategy brief including:
1. Strategic context (2 sentences: why this campaign, why now)
2. The single most important thing creative must communicate
3. The emotion we want to leave the viewer with
4. Creative territories: 3 distinct conceptual directions, each with a one-paragraph description and example visual/copy direction
5. What failure looks like: 3 creative executions we do NOT want
6. Success metrics: what results tell us the creative worked?

Campaign description: [WHAT THIS CAMPAIGN IS DOING AND WHY]
Brand: [BRAND]
Duration: [HOW LONG IT RUNS]
Key message: [CORE MESSAGE]

Generate:
1. 5 campaign name options (internal codename style — clear, memorable, team-rallying)
2. 5 campaign theme options (external-facing — the concept or world the creative lives in)
3. For your top recommendation from each list: explain the strategic rationale

A good campaign name should be immediately understandable in a Slack message. A good campaign theme should make a designer's eyes light up.

I am going to paste research from multiple sources: customer interviews, competitor ads, survey data, review mining. Your job is to synthesize it into a single campaign insight.

A campaign insight is: "[TARGET CUSTOMER] [TENSION OR PARADOX] because [UNDERLYING BELIEF], which means [CAMPAIGN OPPORTUNITY]."

After producing 3 candidate insights, evaluate each on:
- Truth (is it actually what the research says?)
- Tension (is there genuine conflict or paradox?)
- Actionability (can a creative team do something with this?)

Research:
[PASTE RESEARCH]

Product: [PRODUCT]
Stage: [PRE-PURCHASE / JUST PURCHASED / LONG-TIME USER / CHURNED]
Goal: understand the job this product is hired to do and the switching moment

Write 12 interview questions designed to surface JTBD insights:
- 4 questions about the moment before purchase (what triggered the search)
- 4 questions about alternatives considered and why they were rejected
- 4 questions about what success looks like (how they know the job is done)

Rules:
- No leading questions
- All questions open-ended
- Focus on past behavior, not hypothetical future behavior
- Do not mention the product by name until question 9 at earliest

Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Brand perspective: [YOUR BRAND'S POINT OF VIEW]
Timeframe: looking 6–12 months ahead

Identify 5 emerging trends in this industry that are real but not yet mainstream. For each:
- Describe the trend in 2 sentences
- Explain why it is emerging now (driving forces)
- Suggest a content angle for our brand that is ahead of the curve
- Name the content format that best fits this angle
- Flag the risk: what happens if the trend does not materialize?

Prioritize trends where we have a credible, specific perspective — not just general awareness.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Price: [PRICE]
Target buyer: [ICP]
Stage: [COLD TRAFFIC / WARM RETARGETING / EXISTING CUSTOMER UPSELL]

Build a comprehensive objection map:
1. List every objection this buyer might have at this funnel stage
2. Categorize each as: price, trust, need, urgency, or alternatives
3. For each objection, write the 1–2 sentence response that resolves it without sounding defensive
4. Identify the top 3 objections that kill the most conversions at this stage
5. Suggest where on the landing page each response should appear

Format as a table: Objection | Category | Response | Placement.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Customer: [CUSTOMER NAME, ROLE, COMPANY]
Result they achieved: [SPECIFIC RESULT — be quantitative if possible]
Intended use: [WHERE THIS VIDEO WILL BE USED]

Write a video testimonial brief and question guide:
1. The 3 questions to ask (designed to surface the result, the before state, and the "would you recommend" moment)
2. The key moment we need them to say (the quotable line)
3. Filming instructions: length target, setting, what to wear, what to avoid saying
4. The 30-second edit structure if we need a short version

Also write: an example of what a great answer to question 1 sounds like, so the customer understands the depth we are looking for.

Launch date: [DATE]
Product: [PRODUCT]
Channels: [LIST]
Audience size / type: [EXISTING CUSTOMERS / EMAIL LIST / SOCIAL FOLLOWING / ALL]

Build a launch week content calendar (7 days: 3 pre-launch, launch day, 3 post-launch):
For each day and channel:
- Content type and format
- Core message or angle
- CTA
- Any assets needed

Include:
- The one piece of content that does the most conversion work (and why)
- The content most likely to generate organic sharing
- The recovery message if launch day metrics underperform

Format as a table.

Campaign: [DESCRIPTION]
Target KPI: [KPI AND TARGET]
Actual result: [ACTUAL RESULT]
Hypotheses going in: [WHAT DID YOU EXPECT TO WORK AND WHY]

Structure a campaign retrospective:
1. What happened: data summary in 3 bullet points
2. Why it happened: for each hypothesis, what does the evidence say — confirmed, refuted, or inconclusive?
3. What we missed: the assumption that turned out to be wrong
4. What we would do differently: 3 specific changes to the brief, targeting, or creative
5. What to test next: one focused test to recover learning or validate the core premise

Be direct. Do not soften the diagnosis.

I am going to paste a prompt I wrote and the output I received. The output is not meeting my needs.

My task: [WHAT I WAS TRYING TO DO]
What is wrong with the output: [SPECIFIC PROBLEMS — too generic, wrong format, misses the point, etc.]
Constraint I cannot change: [ANY FIXED REQUIREMENTS]

Diagnose why my prompt produced this output. Then:
1. Identify the 3 specific weaknesses in my prompt
2. Rewrite my prompt to fix those weaknesses
3. Explain what each change does and why it will produce better output

My original prompt:
[PASTE PROMPT]

Output I received:
[PASTE OUTPUT]